What the Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003 covers
The Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003 was introduced to tackle persistent nuisance and disruptive behaviour in England and Wales. It gave local authorities, police and social landlords stronger powers to deal with problem behaviour affecting communities.
Most of this legislation has now been replaced by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, which took over as the main framework for dealing with antisocial behaviour. However, understanding the 2003 Act helps explain how the current system developed. You may still see references to it in older tenancy agreements, local authority documents, or cases that began before the 2014 Act came into force.

Anti-Social Behaviour Action Plan
Get a clear action plan to deal with anti-social neighbours. Takes 2 minutes.
Try our Anti-Social Behaviour Action Plan free, here on this site →Key powers under the Act
The 2003 Act introduced measures targeting specific problems that had proven difficult to address under existing laws. These included drug-related nuisance from residential properties, youth antisocial behaviour, and groups causing persistent trouble in public spaces.
Closure orders for problem premises: Police gained the power to apply to a Magistrates Court to close residential properties linked to serious problems. This covered two main situations:
- Properties connected with the use, production or supply of Class A drugs, where there had been serious nuisance or disorder affecting the public in the previous three months
- Properties associated with significant and persistent disorder, or persistent serious nuisance to members of the public in the previous three months
Once a closure order was in place, entering the premises became a criminal offence. Those who breached a closure order could face up to six months in prison or a fine. These orders provided quick relief for neighbours living near properties causing ongoing disruption. The 2014 Act has since replaced these closure powers with updated provisions under Part 4 of that legislation.
Extended powers for social landlords: While registered social landlords such as housing associations already had some ability to seek injunctions under earlier legislation, the 2003 Act expanded these powers. It made it easier for them to take direct action against individuals causing antisocial behaviour without relying solely on the police or local council to intervene first.
Parenting contracts and orders: The Act introduced measures to address antisocial behaviour by young people through their parents. This included formal written agreements between parents and local authorities, and where these proved insufficient, court-ordered parenting programmes designed to improve supervision and control of children involved in problem behaviour.
Community safety orders: The 2003 Act also brought in provisions allowing courts to impose requirements on individuals whose behaviour was causing harassment, alarm or distress. These orders could restrict where someone could go or who they could associate with.
Dispersal powers: Police were given authority to disperse groups in designated areas where antisocial behaviour had been a persistent problem. Officers could move people on and return under-16s to their homes. These powers have since been replaced by the broader dispersal powers in Part 3 of the 2014 Act.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
How the 2014 Act changed things
The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 replaced and simplified the various tools that had built up over the years, including most provisions from the 2003 Act. The aim was to create a more straightforward system that was easier for authorities to use and for the public to understand.
The 2014 Act introduced:
- Civil injunctions to replace ASBOs and other court orders
- Community Protection Notices for ongoing problems affecting a local area
- Public Spaces Protection Orders to restrict activities in specific locations
- Updated closure powers that built on and refined the 2003 provisions
If you are dealing with antisocial behaviour now, the 2014 Act will be the relevant legislation in most cases. However, if your situation involves older documents or historical context, understanding what the 2003 Act covered can help you make sense of references you encounter.
What this means if you have a problem neighbour
If you are experiencing antisocial behaviour from a neighbour, the specific legislation matters less than knowing who can help and what practical steps to take. Your first point of contact will usually be:
- Your local council, which has a duty to investigate antisocial behaviour complaints
- Your landlord, if you rent from a housing association or council
- The police, if the behaviour involves criminal activity or you feel unsafe
Keep a written record of incidents, including dates, times and what happened. This evidence will support any formal complaint you make.
Be aware that councils and housing associations have limited resources and may not be able to resolve every situation. For persistent problems where formal action has not worked, consider community mediation services or seeking legal advice about your options.
Many councils have dedicated antisocial behaviour teams, and housing associations have their own complaints procedures. Contact details are usually available on your local council website or your landlord's website.
For guidance on current antisocial behaviour powers, GOV.UK provides information on the 2014 Act. Citizens Advice can help you understand your rights and options.
If you need a structured approach to tackling your situation, our free Anti-Social Behaviour Action Plan can help you work through your options step by step.
What can we do
Thank you
Dawn Franklin
They were so worried about them that a few years ago they knocked on their door and asked if they were ok. They both said they were. The police have been called numerous times (by themselves!)and we think they are drinking a lot as often the police appear but they don't answer the door. There have been ambulances called out in the night, then they don't answer the door, and since they had their child, social services have been called more than once. The issue is that nothing seems to be done and they can still hear the verbal abuse happening, now involving the daughter who is about 6. The mum tells her that daddy is useless, needs to get a job, to get out of the way amongst other things. We believe the mum is the aggressor. My friend's own daughters have grown up hearing this through the walls and it's very distressing indeed. They've told the neighbours they can hear it many times, banged on their door, shouted through the wall etc. But it just carries on. They are very worried about the little girl's well-being but don't believe she is being physically abused, just verbally.
The mum has had a couple of injuries that we know about including a broken pelvis currently, though we don't believe it's her husband. We think she is drunk and hurts herself. The daughter has been heard begging them to stop. This week my friend told the dad it's so distressing, they've had enough and need it to stop but he just shrugs and says it's just drama, that it's not physical. The worst thing is constantly waiting to hear the next argument as it's very distressing for them to live next door to. Is there anything else they can do to get help and make it stop? My friend is at the end of her tether and the police and social services don't seem to be worried enough about them to do anything other than occasionally visit.
The government may be planning a lock down but here adult men (and their offspring and their wives and parents) have voluntarily not left their yard, front porch. Have not gone further than a few yards /a few steps from their front door, voluntarily because of me.
They watch me and make noise around the clock. Deny their offspring from using parks, fields, forests, just hang around next to my home. Hang around outside.
Usually no-one here anuwhere else uses their gardens. They are empty everywhere else because they are small and people can be seen and people just usually leave their home to do sport or to have some other hobby. In towns. Well even in tve country side i have never seenadult men just hang around. Usually gardens are for the women to use. I have sometimes sen women but never men hanging around at hlne anywhere else.
Here dozens of men hang around not go anywhere like ride a bike to a field take their own famiky, kids to hobbies. They are addicted to me, a strange woman. Dont take their own offspring to hobbies even, they ask other peoole to do that.
They know you can here every move someone makes out because just me walnkng in my garden makes them open blinds and come stare in the window so they choose to yell even teens adult men offspring just hang around here. 3 men stop 3 men start it.
Yes believe me. I am not megalomaniac. These adult men hang around like tgey are prisonersbecause of me, a married woman.
Here adult men hang around on my sake. Dont see anything wierd in that. Hate campaign, noise canpaign. They feel menly like they are defending their rights to use their yards, feel community spirit, hate towards me and watch me, always eyes on my windows, hang around, voluntarily for a decade and longer been just hanging around, not leaving the vicinity of their front porch, all the time outside using appliences and making noise.
maybe they had low self-esteem but they didn't let their kid bother anybody but were always like very court snd ordered their children, about, very considerate of neighbors and anxious to see that they or their kids didnt make noiae. They ordered them to be quiet dont go there hanging about... they just had this look ar their kid and it was enough at a birthdsy party so he would behave and not have any more cake . Or wouldn't be a nuisance to anybody. No parent i knew back then thought that their kid was a gift from god and other people would enjoy his being noisy. Or around even. I liked these considerate parents who didnt think they can do anything just because they have reproduced. I liked them being realistic and low self esteem realizing their kid isnt allowed to make anybodys life miserable. That was out of the question. They , kids knew their place and that was not to bully anyone with noise
Now parents themselves yell, let their kids gather anywhere not just parks and have no limit to what they allow themselves their visitors their families that visit or their kids can make any amount of noise but othwr people dont matter. It is called self esteem? Or selfish?
I have been racial abuse because of this
These neighbours want my home so they can knock a doorway through so the child can move freely between to houses.Fair market price doesn't even come into it . The local Labour party backs these people in what they do infact those controlling the MP refuse me access where he has told me twice i need an MPs surgery meeting.They say they have spent more money on their refurbishment if they had known they would get my house they where supposed best builders in the locality over 5 years which is questionable with the corruption on the local council.
These people are also in the local freemasonry lodge with whom ive had problems for over 50 years.The female couple on the opposite side are basicaly freemason prostitutes.They did havea red light outside the house when i first came hear around 8 to 9 years ago which they have now removed.Again single brick between party walls.
Out the back i have a man who is aggressive verbally abusive and threatening again he is lodge related. He blames me for his rat problem of which his landlord will not address them since he has to spend money.He also refuses to allow me access across a specfic area which is noted in the deeds of both properties from around 1860.He is also known to be involved as all the niegbours are in the illeagal shoot to kill policy covered up by all UK Chief Constables.His claim to fame is killing a traveller in a fight by cutting a leg artery with a stanley knife. Hes been trying to goud me into a fight over the rat issues . He has also had people on my property that are unauthorized for his own ends. Warwickshire Police wont do anything including refusal to record or logg and crime or incident.Per 4022,4020 Leamington Spa police station. Infact they cant even record a correct name and address for purposes of lost property.
Ask Problem Neighbours a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.