You've just bought your dream home and decided to build that conservatory you've always wanted. Six months later, a solicitor's letter lands on your doormat demanding you tear it down. Welcome to the world of restrictive covenants – the legal constraints buried in property deeds that catch out thousands of UK homeowners every year.
If a restrictive covenant dispute arises with a neighbour over what you can do with your property, you can quickly check your legal position using our free Neighbour Rights Checker.
So what exactly is a restrictive covenant?
A restrictive covenant is essentially a set of rules written into your property's deeds that control what you can and can't do with your own land. Previous owners – often the original property developer – put these rules in place, and they remain attached to the property permanently, passing from owner to owner. For a covenant to be enforceable, it must "touch and concern" the land, meaning it relates directly to the use or value of the property rather than personal obligations.
Developers frequently impose restrictive covenants when building new estates. Their aim? Maintaining the area's appearance and protecting their investment. Common restrictions include:
- No caravans or motorhomes on the drive
- No business activities from home
- No building extensions without permission from the developer
- No fences above a certain height (usually 1 metre at the front)
- No keeping chickens or other livestock
- Only certain colours allowed for front doors
Some covenants border on the ridiculous. We've seen cases where homeowners can't hang washing in their front gardens or must seek permission to plant certain types of trees.
Finding out if you're affected
Many people have no idea these restrictions exist until they breach them. Your conveyancing solicitor should have flagged any covenants when you bought the property, but let's face it – not everyone reads through all that paperwork thoroughly.
To check your property's covenants, you'll need your title deeds. If you don't have them to hand, you can download copies from the Land Registry website. Request both the title register and title plan, which together cost £3. Look specifically for sections mentioning "restrictive covenants" or "burdens". They're usually buried in dense legal language that can be challenging to decipher.
A typical covenant might read: "Not to erect any building or structure on the said land without the written consent of XYZ Developments Ltd". Sounds harmless enough until you realise XYZ Developments went bust 15 years ago. Tracking down who now holds the benefit of that covenant – and therefore who can enforce it – becomes a complex task.

Noise Complaint Letter Builder
Generate a formal noise complaint letter ready to send. Takes 2 minutes.
Try our Noise Complaint Letter Builder free, here on this site →Who can actually enforce these covenants?
It's not just developers who can enforce covenants. Anyone who has the "benefit" of the covenant can potentially take action against you. This might include:
- The original developer or their successors
- Neighbours whose properties also have the covenant (if it was drafted to benefit all properties on the estate)
- Anyone who has specifically acquired the right to enforce
- Management companies on newer developments
When covenants bite back
Problems typically surface when neighbours get involved. Take Sarah from Birmingham, who built a two-storey extension without realising her property had a "single-storey only" covenant. Her neighbour, checking their own deeds during a boundary dispute, discovered the restriction applied to both properties. The neighbour complained to the original developer (still trading), who demanded Sarah apply for retrospective consent at a cost of £2,500. After negotiations, she secured permission for £1,500 but had to agree to specific external finishes to match the estate's character.
Home businesses create another common flashpoint. With remote working now standard, that innocent-sounding "no trade or business" covenant suddenly matters. Hairdressers have been forced to stop seeing clients at home, and childminders have discovered their perfectly legitimate business breaches decades-old restrictions.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
What happens if you've already breached a covenant?
First, don't panic. For someone to successfully enforce a covenant through the courts, they need to prove the breach causes them "substantial injury or loss". This might include decreased property values, loss of privacy, or significant changes to the neighbourhood's character. Courts tend to be reluctant to enforce petty or outdated restrictions, particularly where the breach has existed for years without complaint.
Your options include:
- Negotiating retrospective consent – Contact whoever holds the benefit and request permission. Costs vary wildly from £500 to £5,000 depending on the developer and the nature of your breach
- Indemnity insurance – Typically costs £200-£500 and protects you if someone tries to enforce the covenant. However, you cannot obtain insurance if you're already in dispute, if the beneficiary has been contacted about the breach, or if enforcement action has begun. Many insurers also require the breach to have existed for at least 12 months
- Apply to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) – The tribunal can modify or discharge covenants if they're obsolete, prevent reasonable use of the land, or provide no practical benefit. Application fees start at £600, plus legal costs typically ranging from £5,000-£15,000. The tribunal considers factors like changes to the neighbourhood's character and whether money would adequately compensate the beneficiary
- Wait it out – If nobody's complained for 20 years despite obvious breaches, courts might consider the covenant abandoned, though this isn't guaranteed
Getting proper legal help
This really isn't DIY territory. Property law contains numerous technicalities that could work in your favour. A specialist solicitor might discover the covenant was poorly drafted, that the chain of enforcement has been broken, or that the original developer failed to properly reserve enforcement rights when selling the last plot on the estate.
Recent cases have shown courts taking a pragmatic approach. In one 2019 decision, the Upper Tribunal discharged a covenant preventing business use because the character of the area had changed significantly since the 1960s, with many properties already operating home businesses.
The Law Society website can help you find a specialist property solicitor. Expect to pay £150-£250 per hour for advice. Yes, it's expensive, but it beats demolishing that £30,000 extension or facing a lengthy court battle.
One final thought for prospective buyers: actually read those covenants before purchasing. Estate agents rarely mention them, and that bargain house might come with restrictions that significantly affect your plans. Check whether covenants are registered against the property and who can enforce them. Five minutes of reading now could prevent years of disputes and thousands in legal fees later.
Remember, restrictive covenants remain a civil matter between private parties. While breaching them isn't a criminal offence, the financial and practical consequences can be severe. When in doubt, seek professional advice before making any significant changes to your property.
Thank you
I moved in 9 years ago with 3 dogs and have had 4 dogs since 2018.
My neighbours on one side are definitely not dog people. On the other side the neighbours partner moved in 6 years ago. They are now threatening to seek legal advice due to the number of dogs I have.
I have spent several thousand pounds putting up new fencing, the dogs are not allowed out in the garden unattended, I've had blinds fitted to restrict their view from windows.
Does anyone know if the 89 year old covenant is enforceable? Other than a few words over the fence no official complaint had ever been made.
Thanks Mary
Now he’s running quad bikes over the land to spoil it for residents and public. Is this in violation of the covenant?
Many thanks
We have lived in are home for 18years without a problem until the new neighbours moved in the previous owner never bothered if we parked on his land to put garden rubbish in the boot and take it to the tip.
But now the new people have sent us a solicitors letter informing us that they will take us to court if we stop on his land for any reason.
We have a garage and a a parking space to the front of the garage but the garage is small and we cannot get garden rubbish past the car when its in the garage, so would have to move out, we have two cars one in the garage and one on the drive, please advise
We want a hedge on our property, recently a neighbour put up a wooden fence on our land without permission. I actually went out and stated she is breaking the covenant rules and I didn't want a fence put up.
Took absolutely no notice of me and has put the fence up on my land.
What are my rights on this? Any advice welcome.
I might add that the landlords house next door is in total disrepair and we have requested jobs to be done i.e. leaking basement which has caused damp to our inside wall. He has never had the work done. The solicitors letter is quite harrassing
and badly worded and also the facts are totally wrong. Please help.
My neighbour parks his waste collection commercial truck always full of rubbish, opposite my drive making it extremely difficult to reverse on or off it.
Is there anything I can do without having to re-employ my conveyancer?
There is a convenants on this land stating no buildings(other than those now erected or one garden shed) shall be erected on said land.
Is there anything I can do now?
Ask Problem Neighbours a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.